Airvida – Wearable Air Purifier
99% pollen removal rate
(Far Infrared Association, Japan)
Testing results of Airvida by authoritative laboratories
.Airvida removes 99.9% of pollen & PM2.5 (air pollutant) from the air 1
(Far Infrared Association, Japan)
.Airvida removes 99.9% of virus from the air 2
(Kitasato Research Center for Environmental Science, Japan)
1 Refer to the official test report 220S-1018, 219S-981, 219S-918, 216S-755, 218S-873, and 219S-985 from Far Infrared Association (Japan).
2 Referring to the official test report No. 2020_0031 from Japan’s Kitasato Research Center for Environmental Science, testing was conducted in a 0.2 cubic meter space. The tested virus was Escherichia coli phage MS2 NBRC 102619, and the tested models were L1, M1, and C1.
Do you know?
Long‐term PM2.5 exposure is associated with increased risks of
ischemic heart disease mortality, cerebrovascular mortality, and incident stroke.
Sources from Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (Journal)
How does Airvida purify the pollutants in the air?
Airborne particles including
PM2.5, PM10, pollen,
formaldehyde, secondhand smoke, pet dander
Airvida generates negative ions
Airvida generates 2 million negative ions every 0.6 seconds around the user’s facial area
Negative ions will attach the particles within close proximity
Turning them into bigger & heavier chunks and thus falling to the ground
PM2.5 Removal Test in Open Area
Click the button in the center of the video
International laboratory certification report
>99.9%
>99.9%
>99.9%
(Referring to the official test report No. 2020_0031 from Japan’s Kitasato Research Center for Environmental Science, testing was conducted in a 0.2 cubic meter space. The tested virus was Escherichia coli phage MS2 NBRC 102619, and the tested models were L1, M1 and C1.)
>99.7%
(Referring to the official test reports No. 2022_0287 from Japan Kitasato Research Center for Environmental Science, testing was conducted in a 0.2m3 space. The tested virus was Influenza A virus, and the tested models were E1 and M2.)
>99.0%
>90.8%
(Referring to the official test reports UG/2016/50319A-01, STI-20190606-014N, STI-20190417-009N, and FTS202303131E-1 from SGS, Sci-tech, and Feifan, the tested bacteria included environmental strains, naturally occurring airborne bacteria, and Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619. The tested models were L1, M1, C1, and M2.)